Before deploying VMware Avi Load Balancer, you must collect detailed information about the application environment, traffic behavior, and security needs. This helps ensure your design is scalable, efficient, and aligned with business goals.
Start by understanding what the application needs in order to be delivered properly through Avi.
Protocol Requirements
Identify the network protocols used by the application:
HTTP / HTTPS – Web applications
TCP – Databases, email services
UDP – DNS, voice services, streaming media
WebSocket – Real-time communication
gRPC – Microservices communication
Session Persistence Needs
Determine if users should consistently connect to the same backend server:
Source IP persistence
Cookie-based persistence
No persistence (stateless applications)
SSL/TLS Handling
Understand how the application handles secure traffic:
SSL Offload – Avi decrypts HTTPS and forwards traffic as plain HTTP
SSL Passthrough – Avi does not decrypt traffic
SSL Re-encryption – Avi decrypts, inspects, and re-encrypts traffic before sending it to the backend
Performance Expectations
Clarify expected performance metrics:
Latency requirements (e.g., <100ms)
Expected number of concurrent users or CPS (Connections Per Second)
Throughput requirements (data per second)
These influence how you design Service Engines and Virtual Services.
Once application needs are clear, you must assess traffic volume and patterns.
Average and Peak CPS
Determine average and maximum expected CPS. This metric directly impacts how many SEs you need and how powerful they must be.
Bandwidth Requirements
Estimate total incoming and outgoing data per second. This affects SE throughput planning and licensing (especially if throughput-based licensing is used).
Transaction Sizes
Understand if your application uses:
Small packets (e.g., chat messages, API calls)
Large files (e.g., media, documents)
This helps in tuning TCP buffers, compression, and caching settings.
Burst Traffic Behavior
Analyze how traffic behaves over time:
Steady traffic?
Sudden spikes (e.g., product launches, holidays)?
Daily or weekly usage patterns?
Knowing this helps you decide whether to configure auto-scaling or reserve additional capacity.
Security design must be addressed up front to avoid costly reconfiguration later.
SSL Inspection and Decryption
Determine whether HTTPS traffic should be decrypted:
Required for WAF, analytics, or custom header inspection
Requires managing SSL certificates and keys in the Avi Controller
May impact CPU usage on SEs
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Check if the app must be protected against OWASP Top 10 threats:
SQL Injection, Cross-site scripting, etc.
WAF can be enabled per Virtual Service
Requires tuning to reduce false positives
Multi-Tenancy and Isolation
For environments with multiple business units or customers:
Use Avi’s Tenants to logically separate configurations
Each tenant gets its own VS, Pools, analytics, and certificates
Prevent cross-tenant visibility and configuration access
Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)
Define user roles and assign permissions:
Read-only users: View logs and configs
Operators: Restart services, monitor health
Admins: Full access to configure and manage resources
RBAC supports security best practices and audit readiness.
Capacity planning ensures your Avi Load Balancer deployment can handle current workloads and scale as traffic increases. This includes planning for both the Controller cluster and Service Engines (SEs).
The Avi Controller is the central control plane that manages configurations, policies, SE deployment, and telemetry data. It is critical to ensure it is sized correctly.
Cluster Design
Always deploy Controllers as a 3-node cluster for high availability.
They operate in an active-active mode for control tasks.
The cluster uses quorum-based decision-making.
CPU and Memory Requirements
Controller resource needs grow with:
Number of Virtual Services (VS)
Number of Service Engines (SEs)
Frequency and size of analytics data
As a general rule:
Start with at least 8 vCPUs and 24 GB RAM per node in medium environments.
Increase resources for large-scale deployments with hundreds of VSs.
Placement Best Practices
Do not place all Controllers and SEs in the same failure domain (e.g., same rack or availability zone).
This ensures fault tolerance in case of localized hardware or network failures.
Service Engines do the actual work of handling client traffic, performing load balancing, SSL termination, content switching, and more.
CPU and Memory Requirements
Each SE is deployed as a VM or container.
The required vCPUs and RAM depend on:
Number of concurrent client connections
Whether SSL is offloaded (SSL consumes CPU)
Number of Virtual Services hosted on the SE
A few examples:
Small SE: 2 vCPUs, 4 GB RAM (light traffic)
Medium SE: 4 vCPUs, 8 GB RAM (moderate traffic)
Large SE: 8+ vCPUs, 16+ GB RAM (high throughput, SSL)
Headroom Planning
Always plan for extra capacity to allow for:
Sudden traffic spikes
Maintenance (e.g., taking one SE offline)
Auto-scaling events
Avoid resource starvation by ensuring host infrastructure has enough CPU/memory available for SEs to expand when needed.
Avi supports horizontal scaling, which means you can add more SEs to handle increased load. The system also supports elastic scaling.
Horizontal Scaling with SE Groups
SEs are grouped into Service Engine Groups (SE Groups).
Each group can scale independently.
Virtual Services are assigned to SE Groups.
Auto-Scaling Triggers
You can configure scaling policies based on:
CPU utilization
Memory usage
Network throughput (Mbps or packets per second)
Connections per second (CPS)
Elastic HA (N+M) Design
Instead of statically assigning backups, use N+M redundancy:
N = number of active SEs needed
M = number of spare SEs
Ensures availability without overprovisioning
Efficient and cost-effective for large or unpredictable workloads
High availability (HA) ensures your application delivery continues without interruption, even when a failure occurs in hardware, software, or the network. In Avi, HA is achieved through redundancy in both the control plane (Controllers) and data plane (Service Engines).
The Avi Controller cluster is the brain of the system, so its high availability is critical.
3-Node Cluster Design
Always deploy three Controller nodes for full HA.
These nodes form a quorum-based cluster:
Active-Active Control Plane
All three Controllers are active simultaneously for handling:
Configuration changes
Analytics collection
Monitoring
If one node fails, the remaining two continue operations seamlessly.
Availability Zones
Place each Controller node in a separate fault domain:
Different racks
Different data centers or cloud availability zones
This avoids single points of failure in power, networking, or storage.
Service Engines process live traffic, so HA for SEs ensures no user impact if a VM or host fails.
Avi supports multiple SE HA models, and you can choose per use case.
One primary SE handles all traffic.
One secondary SE is on standby, ready to take over.
Instant failover when the primary fails.
Used for stateful Virtual Services or low concurrency needs.
Pros: Fast failover, resource-efficient for low-scale apps
Cons: Standby SE is unused until failover, wasting resources in some cases
Multiple SEs handle traffic concurrently.
Load is balanced across all SEs in the group.
If one fails, traffic is redistributed to remaining SEs.
Pros: Better performance and resource utilization
Cons: Not ideal for all applications (some may require sticky sessions)
Deploy N active SEs (to handle current load)
Add M standby SEs (shared across many VSs)
Avi will dynamically assign standby SEs when needed.
This model provides:
High resilience
Efficient use of resources
Automatic scaling and failover
Example:
10 SEs needed for regular traffic (N = 10)
Add 2 spares (M = 2)
If any of the 10 fail, the 2 spares can take over
A fault domain is a group of infrastructure components (hosts, racks, zones) that could fail together.
Design Principles
Distribute Controllers and SEs across at least two fault domains
Avoid placing both active and standby SEs on the same host or rack
In cloud: use Availability Zones (AZs) to isolate components
This ensures the system remains available during:
Rack failures
Host crashes
Power outages
Network segmentation
| Component | HA Strategy |
|---|---|
| Controller | 3-node quorum cluster, active-active control, separate fault domains |
| SE: Active/Standby | One active, one standby per VS – instant failover, simpler design |
| SE: Active/Active | Shared traffic across multiple SEs, better performance and scalability |
| SE: Elastic HA | N active + M standby SEs for dynamic failover and scaling |
| Fault Domain Design | Distribute across racks, hosts, or AZs to prevent shared points of failure |
Multi-tenancy allows you to logically divide your Avi Load Balancer environment into isolated sections. This is essential for supporting multiple teams, business units, environments, or customers on the same Avi platform without overlap or interference.
A tenant in Avi is a logical container that isolates configuration, analytics, and operational data.
Key Concepts:
Each tenant has its own:
Virtual Services
Pools
SSL certificates
Health monitors
Analytics data
Tenants can be:
Departments (e.g., HR, Finance, Engineering)
Environments (e.g., Dev, Test, Prod)
Clients (in a service provider model)
Benefits:
Logical separation
Independent management per tenant
No visibility into other tenants’ data
Best Practices:
Use separate Service Engine Groups per tenant when traffic or performance isolation is required
Create naming conventions for easier organization
RBAC enables user access control based on their role and associated privileges.
Common Roles:
Read-Only: Can view configurations and analytics, but cannot make changes
Operator: Can perform actions like restarting services or applying policies
Tenant Admin: Full control within a specific tenant, but not system-wide
System Admin: Full control over all tenants and system settings
How It Works:
Users are assigned roles
Roles define permissions
Users can be scoped to specific tenants
RBAC Design Tips:
Use LDAP or Active Directory integration for user authentication
Keep least-privilege principle in mind
Use custom roles for fine-grained control
Avi can manage resources in multiple environments (called clouds), such as:
vCenter-based private cloud
AWS
Azure
OpenStack
Each cloud can be assigned:
To specific tenants
With its own authentication, image templates, and networking rules
Cloud Isolation Use Cases:
Dev tenant uses vCenter Cloud A
Prod tenant uses AWS Cloud B
Tenants cannot see or control each other’s infrastructure
Scoping Access:
Users can be restricted to:
Specific tenants
Specific clouds
Specific roles in each cloud
This allows full flexibility in hybrid or multi-cloud environments, while maintaining strict isolation and access control.
| Feature | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Tenants | Logical separation of apps, teams, or clients |
| RBAC | Fine-grained user access control based on roles and responsibilities |
| Cloud Configuration | Isolate and scope cloud environments by tenant |
| Security and Governance | Prevent misconfiguration and maintain compliance |
Networking design in Avi Load Balancer affects performance, reachability, scalability, and high availability. It is essential to carefully plan Service Engine placement, VIP management, and routing behavior.
Service Engines process live traffic, so they must be deployed strategically close to backend applications.
Key Guidelines:
Low Latency: Place SEs in the same data center, region, or cloud availability zone as the applications they serve.
Proximity: Avoid routing traffic through long, unnecessary network paths.
Avoid Bottlenecks: Distribute SEs to avoid network chokepoints or shared resource contention.
Deployment Modes:
One-Arm Mode:
SEs use a single interface for both client and server-side communication.
Simplifies routing and VLAN configuration.
Useful in small or simple environments.
Two-Arm Mode:
SEs have separate interfaces for client-side and server-side networks.
Offers better isolation and control.
Preferred in enterprise environments with strict segmentation.
A Virtual IP (VIP) is the IP address clients connect to when accessing applications through Avi.
Planning VIPs:
Pre-allocate IP ranges for VIPs based on application tiers, environments, or tenants.
Choose between:
Static IP Assignment: Manual configuration of VIPs.
Dynamic IPAM: Avi integrates with IP Address Management (IPAM) systems to automatically assign VIPs.
External vs Internal VIPs:
External VIPs: Used for internet-facing services (public DNS, secured via firewall/NAT).
Internal VIPs: Used within the data center or VPC (for east-west traffic).
Best Practices:
Reserve enough VIPs for future growth.
Use separate subnets for different environments (e.g., dev, test, prod).
Use DNS to map friendly names to VIPs.
Route advertisements allow Avi to inform upstream routers about where to find VIPs.
Supported Protocols:
BGP (Border Gateway Protocol)
OSPF (Open Shortest Path First)
When a new VIP is created or moved between SEs, Avi can dynamically update the routing tables of the network.
Benefits of Dynamic Routing:
Fast failover (if an SE fails, the VIP is advertised from another SE)
Efficient path selection
No need for manual route configuration
ECMP (Equal-Cost Multi-Path Routing):
Avi supports ECMP to distribute traffic across multiple SEs that advertise the same VIP.
Enhances performance and reliability.
Must be supported by upstream routers and switches.
Policy-Based Routing (PBR):
You can define routing behavior based on:
Source IP
Destination port
Application type
Useful for multi-tenant environments or service segmentation.
| Component | Key Considerations |
|---|---|
| SE Placement | Deploy near backend apps, choose one-arm or two-arm mode based on needs |
| VIP Allocation | Use IPAM or pre-allocated pools, plan for internal and external services |
| Route Advertising | Use BGP or OSPF for dynamic updates, enable ECMP for load sharing |
| PBR | Customize routing per application or tenant |
Security and compliance are foundational aspects of any enterprise-grade load balancing architecture. VMware Avi Load Balancer includes features for SSL/TLS management, Web Application Firewall (WAF), isolation, and access control — all of which need to be planned properly during design.
Centralized and secure SSL handling is essential for protecting data and simplifying administration.
Centralized Certificate Management
Avi Controller centrally manages:
SSL certificates
Certificate chains
Private keys
You can import certificates manually or automate via:
APIs
ACME (e.g., Let’s Encrypt)
Integration with enterprise PKI
Key Design Points:
Plan certificate lifecycles, expiration alerts, and renewal workflows
Use secure key storage and access restrictions
Automate renewal and deployment wherever possible
SNI (Server Name Indication) Support
Multiple domains can share one Virtual Service (VS) using SNI
Example: one VIP hosts:
api.example.com
app.example.com
Each domain can use a different SSL certificate
Avi’s built-in Web Application Firewall (WAF) helps protect applications from Layer 7 attacks.
OWASP Protection
Defends against OWASP Top 10 threats, including:
SQL injection
Cross-site scripting (XSS)
Command injection
Uses ModSecurity engine with customizable rules
Design Considerations:
Enable WAF per Virtual Service as needed (not globally)
Start in Detection Mode to monitor traffic without blocking
Transition to Blocking Mode once confident in rule tuning
Adjust signatures to reduce false positives
Performance Impact
WAF introduces some processing overhead
Consider enabling only on services that require strict security
Strong segmentation ensures compliance and limits the blast radius of potential breaches.
Service Engine Group Isolation
Assign different SE Groups for:
Each tenant
Different application types (e.g., internet-facing vs internal)
SE Groups can use different:
Networks
Security policies
Scaling thresholds
Network-Level Isolation
Use separate VLANs or subnets for:
Front-end (client-facing) traffic
Back-end (app/server-facing) traffic
Apply firewall rules between:
SEs and backend servers
Tenants
Zones or regions
Compliance-Oriented Design
Align isolation with standards like:
PCI-DSS (finance)
HIPAA (healthcare)
GDPR (data privacy)
Maintain audit logs, enforce RBAC, and ensure traffic encryption
| Component | Key Planning Considerations |
|---|---|
| SSL Management | Centralized cert storage, SNI for multi-domain TLS, secure key handling |
| WAF | Enable per VS, begin in detection mode, tune rules to reduce false positives |
| Isolation | Use SE Group and network separation for app and tenant segmentation |
| Compliance Support | Meet industry requirements with logging, access control, and encrypted traffic |
In modern environments, integration with automation, monitoring, and cloud platforms is essential for agility, observability, and scalability. This section covers how Avi fits into broader enterprise and DevOps ecosystems.
Avi is built with a REST API-first approach, making it easy to automate every aspect of configuration and operation.
Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) Integration:
Terraform:
Use Terraform providers to define Avi objects (e.g., Virtual Services, Pools, SE Groups) as code
Enables repeatable, version-controlled deployments
Ansible:
Automate tasks such as:
Creating/deleting Virtual Services
Modifying pools or SSL settings
Use Avi’s Ansible collection for full control
vRealize Automation (vRA):
Allow self-service provisioning of applications with integrated load balancing
Useful for internal platforms or private cloud portals
CI/CD Integration:
Trigger Avi configuration changes from tools like:
Jenkins
GitLab CI/CD
GitHub Actions
Design Tips:
Keep automation templates modular and reusable
Use tagging and naming standards
Manage sensitive data (e.g., certificates, credentials) securely
Visibility into application and infrastructure performance is critical for operations, security, and compliance.
Log Streaming:
Avi can send logs to external platforms in real time:
Syslog
Kafka
Elasticsearch
Splunk
Logs include:
Client connection details
Application performance data
Security events (WAF, SSL errors)
System activity and audit logs
Metric Collection:
Avi provides detailed telemetry:
Per Virtual Service, per Pool, per backend server
Latency, errors, throughput, SSL handshake times
Export metrics to:
Prometheus
Grafana
vRealize Operations
Dashboards:
Use built-in UI or external tools to build custom dashboards:
For application teams (per-application health)
For operations (SE resource usage, alerts)
Avi can be deployed across multiple cloud providers and integrates with each platform’s native features.
Supported Clouds:
vCenter (private cloud): Full integration with VMware ecosystem (NSX-T, DRS, vMotion)
AWS: Uses EC2, Elastic IPs, and IAM
Azure: Supports NSGs, Load Balancer, and VM scale sets
Google Cloud Platform (GCP)
OpenStack
Cloud Configuration Planning:
Each cloud is defined as a Cloud Object in Avi
You can assign clouds to:
Specific tenants
Specific SE Groups
Each cloud has its own:
Authentication method
Image templates
Networking and IPAM configuration
Design Considerations:
Plan separate clouds for dev/test/prod
Use cloud-native networking and security wherever possible
Monitor cloud-specific resource limits (e.g., max interfaces per VM)
| Integration Area | Design Focus |
|---|---|
| Automation & DevOps | Use Terraform, Ansible, and vRA for provisioning and config-as-code |
| CI/CD Pipelines | Enable dynamic VS creation/config updates in app release workflows |
| Logging & Monitoring | Stream logs to ELK, Splunk, etc.; expose metrics to Prometheus/Grafana |
| Cloud Providers | Define clouds per platform; assign per tenant or use case; enable native integration |
Application delivery in Avi Load Balancer revolves around a few core concepts:
Virtual Services (VS): The front-end IP and port that clients connect to
Pools: Groups of backend servers that receive traffic from the VS
Policies and Scripts: Advanced customization of traffic handling
This step involves translating application architecture into load balancing components.
Virtual Services (VS):
A VS represents a service exposed to clients
It includes:
VIP (Virtual IP)
Port (e.g., 80, 443)
Protocol (HTTP, HTTPS, TCP, UDP)
SSL Profile (if HTTPS)
Load balancing policies
Each application usually maps to one or more VS instances
Pools:
A Pool is a collection of backend servers
Each VS is associated with one or more Pools
You can configure:
Load balancing algorithms (Round Robin, Least Connections, etc.)
Health monitors
Connection limits
Persistence profiles
Multi-Domain Hosting (SNI):
Use SNI-based Virtual Services to host multiple domains on one VIP:
Each SNI domain can:
Use a different SSL certificate
Point to different backend pools
Design Considerations:
Use consistent naming for Pools and VSs
Separate internal and external services
Group services by tenant or application type
Avi allows advanced customization through DataScripts, which are Lua-based scripts executed at runtime.
Use Cases:
Header manipulation (add, remove, or rewrite headers)
Custom logging
Conditional redirects
Blocking or allowing traffic based on logic (IP, URI, time, etc.)
Traffic shaping or filtering
Example Scenarios:
Add a security header to all HTTP responses
Redirect mobile users to a different domain
Drop requests from a specific country or IP range
Best Practices:
Test scripts in staging before deploying in production
Use logging to validate script behavior
Keep scripts readable and modular
Health Monitors actively or passively check the health of backend servers to ensure only healthy ones receive traffic.
Types of Health Monitors:
ICMP (Ping)
TCP (Check open ports)
HTTP/HTTPS (Send a request and expect a response)
DNS
LDAP
Custom External Scripts
Key Configurations:
Frequency (how often to check)
Timeout (how long to wait)
Successful/failed thresholds (number of tries before marking a server up/down)
Custom request/response strings (e.g., expect “200 OK”)
Best Practices:
Customize per application
Use appropriate health monitor types (e.g., HTTP for web, TCP for DB)
Avoid aggressive frequency unless required
| Component | Key Points |
|---|---|
| Virtual Services | Represent front-end service endpoint; can use SNI for multi-domain setups |
| Pools | Define backend server groups and load balancing behavior |
| DataScripts | Add custom logic for advanced traffic control and inspection |
| Health Monitors | Continuously verify backend server health to ensure availability |
Turning business goals into effective load balancer architecture requires structured requirement analysis.
Performance Goals:
Define latency, throughput, QPS (queries per second), and failover RTO/RPO.
Choose SE sizing and quantity accordingly (e.g., dedicated SEs for high-throughput apps).
Scalability Requirements:
Elastic HA model, auto-scaling policies, SE group placement in multi-cloud.
Account for future growth: avoid static provisioning.
Security and Compliance:
TLS offloading, WAF profiles, audit logging, RBAC, and integration with corporate IDPs (LDAP, SAML).
Enforce network isolation by tenant, restrict API access.
Cost Constraints:
Decide on deployment model (on-prem vs. cloud).
Map traffic throughput and SE cores to licensing tier.
Use a weighted decision matrix to score tradeoffs across:
Cost vs. Performance
Agility vs. Control
Scalability vs. Operational complexity
Example:
If the business goal is rapid cloud adoption with limited CapEx, prioritize automation and public cloud SEs over deploying in private DCs.
Transitioning from traditional appliances (F5, Citrix) to Avi must be carefully planned.
Inventory and Assessment:
Catalog all Virtual Servers, Pools, SSL certs, WAF rules, and iRules.
Identify deprecated or redundant services.
Design Mapping:
Convert legacy LB features (VIPs, persistence, SSL profiles) to Avi equivalents.
Address gaps such as unsupported features or differing configurations.
Migration Execution Models:
Lift and Shift: Quick, like-for-like migration of services.
Phased Rollout: App-by-app cutover, with coexistence and testing.
Rollback Strategy:
Always retain the ability to return to legacy LB (e.g., dual DNS entries, NAT routing).
Use DNS TTL to control traffic switchover.
Risk Mitigation:
Mirror traffic to Avi in parallel.
Use Avi’s FlightPath and metrics to validate behavior before cutting over.
Leverage test tenants or non-production zones for dry-runs.
Avi licensing models can influence architecture. Design decisions must reflect usage forecasts and licensing tiers.
Throughput-Based: Charges based on aggregate inbound/outbound bandwidth.
Per-SE vCPU: Each SE’s vCPU count contributes to total entitlement.
Per-App (Per VS): Suitable for microservices or service-provider models.
High QPS, small-size transactions → Favor vCPU model.
Large file transfers (e.g., video apps) → Favor Throughput model.
High VS count with many tenants → Per-App licensing is more predictable.
Include:
Hardware/VM resources for SEs and Controllers
Cloud IaaS cost (if deploying SEs in public cloud)
Operational cost (support, automation tools)
License cost (bandwidth or CPU-based)
| Factor | On-Prem | Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| CapEx | High (HW, hypervisors) | Low |
| Opex | Lower (once deployed) | Higher (IaaS ongoing) |
| Elasticity | Limited | Native scaling |
| DR | Manual or high cost | Easier with cloud-native SE groups |
Designing for fault tolerance is critical for exam scenario questions and production resilience.
SE HA models: Active/Active, Active/Standby, Elastic N+M.
Failure triggers automatic traffic redistribution.
Auto-replacement: If enabled, new SEs are spun up automatically.
3-node cluster recommended (quorum required).
SEs continue forwarding traffic even if Controllers are all down.
Management, analytics, and configuration changes will pause.
Design GSLB for regional traffic distribution.
Use multi-region Controllers with separate SE Groups per region.
Implement traffic steering policies (latency-based, geo-based).
Active-Passive DCs: One site active, other on hot standby.
Active-Active GSLB: Both DCs serve traffic with failover routing.
Use shared configuration backup, replication of analytics if needed.
Avi design must account for long-term manageability.
Integrate with SNMP, Syslog, Prometheus, ELK, Grafana.
Set alert thresholds per tenant, per VS (e.g., CPU > 80%, health score < 60).
Define Analytics Profiles to tailor data granularity.
Plan for:
Number of Virtual Services
Expected peak QPS
TLS session rates
Multi-tenant growth
Use historical metrics + forecasted trends.
Use SSL Profiles per VS or tenant.
Plan for certificate rotation policy, expiration alerts.
Automate via API or external vaults (e.g., HashiCorp).
Use rolling upgrades (Controller → SE).
Validate image compatibility, disk space, and automation scripts.
Schedule maintenance windows, drain traffic with Maintenance Mode.
Periodic clean-up of:
Old logs and analytics data
Unused VS/SE objects
Expired certs and profiles
Every Avi deployment must undergo structured design review before going live.
Tenant mapping validated
SE Group placement and limits defined
Licensing model aligned with expected usage
RBAC and audit logging configured
Integration with monitoring and CI/CD pipeline tested
Performance Testing:
Simulate expected traffic volume using synthetic test tools (e.g., Apache JMeter)
Validate QPS, latency, CPU usage under load
Pre-Go-Live Checklist:
Backup config
Confirm NTP, DNS, SMTP reachability
Validate alerting and analytics dashboards
Run FlightPath traces and error simulation
Architecture diagram
Design decisions log
API schema documentation (Swagger/OpenAPI)
Change control log and rollback plans
| Area | Key Focus |
|---|---|
| Requirement Mapping | Align business goals with technical solutions |
| Migration Strategy | Structured F5/Citrix to Avi cutover with rollback |
| Licensing Impact | Choose model based on traffic pattern and cost model |
| Failure Recovery | Build resilient SE/Controller architectures |
| Lifecycle Planning | Prepare for upgrades, monitoring, capacity, certs |
| Validation Process | Use checklists, tests, and documentation |
What is the recommended number of nodes in an Avi Controller cluster for production deployments?
Three Controller nodes are recommended for production environments.
Avi Controllers form a cluster that manages configuration, analytics, and orchestration. A three-node cluster ensures high availability through quorum-based consensus.
With three nodes:
the system tolerates a single controller failure
configuration and analytics services remain operational
cluster decisions maintain quorum
A two-node configuration is not recommended because quorum cannot be reliably maintained during failures.
Exam scenarios mentioning controller cluster resilience or quorum typically expect three controllers as the correct design choice.
Demand Score: 79
Exam Relevance Score: 92
Which factors should be considered when sizing Service Engines?
Key factors include expected traffic volume, SSL processing requirements, connection rates, and application throughput.
Service Engines process application traffic, so their sizing directly affects performance. Administrators must evaluate:
concurrent connections
requests per second
SSL/TLS termination load
network throughput requirements
SSL termination can significantly increase CPU utilization, so environments with heavy encrypted traffic often require additional Service Engines.
Proper sizing ensures traffic is distributed efficiently while maintaining performance and avoiding resource exhaustion.
In exam questions, if a scenario mentions performance capacity planning, the focus is usually on Service Engine sizing rather than controller resources.
Demand Score: 88
Exam Relevance Score: 90
Why would an administrator deploy multiple Service Engine Groups in a design?
To support workload segmentation, resource isolation, and policy differentiation.
Service Engine Groups allow different applications or tenants to operate under separate resource policies. For example:
production applications may require high CPU and strict HA policies
development workloads may use smaller resource allocations
By separating workloads into multiple SE Groups, administrators can maintain predictable performance and isolate environments.
This is particularly useful in multi-tenant environments where different teams or customers require distinct policies.
Exam questions often include scenarios involving different environments or application tiers, which indicates the need for multiple Service Engine Groups.
Demand Score: 74
Exam Relevance Score: 88
What design feature allows Avi to scale load balancing capacity automatically?
Elastic scaling of Service Engines.
Avi’s distributed architecture allows the Controller to dynamically deploy additional Service Engines when traffic demand increases.
This scaling mechanism ensures that:
application performance remains stable
traffic spikes are handled automatically
infrastructure resources are used efficiently
When demand decreases, unused Service Engines can be removed to conserve resources.
This elastic scaling capability is a major advantage compared with traditional hardware load balancers.
Exam questions describing automatic scaling during traffic spikes typically refer to Service Engine elastic scaling.
Demand Score: 80
Exam Relevance Score: 91
What design principle allows Avi to separate management logic from traffic processing?
The separation of control plane and data plane.
Avi Controllers operate in the control plane, managing policies, analytics, and orchestration.
Service Engines operate in the data plane, processing application traffic.
This separation allows the platform to scale independently:
controllers handle configuration and monitoring
Service Engines handle network traffic
The design improves scalability and resilience because the failure of a Service Engine does not impact controller operations.
Exam questions often test this concept by asking which component handles traffic processing vs orchestration.
Demand Score: 83
Exam Relevance Score: 93